Fluent vs Conexiom for Epicor Kinetic Sales Order Entry: Approval Workflows Without Format Mapping
Fluent vs Conexiom for Epicor Kinetic sales order entry: how each works, a side-by-side table, and why Fluent's approval workflows and instruction-based setup fit Kinetic teams better.
Gonzalo Nuñez
Chief Technology Officer

Fluent and Conexiom both turn emailed customer purchase orders into sales orders. Conexiom works across many ERPs and maps each new customer's format before that customer's orders are automated. Fluent is built for Epicor Kinetic: it installs nothing inside Epicor, reads a new customer's first order like any other, covers AP invoices, packing slips and eight other Kinetic screens from the same platform, and runs every draft through approval workflows before anything is written. The right approvers are picked by rules written in plain language, an approval agent tells each one what to check, and approvers can decide by replying to the email.
How each approaches sales order entry
Conexiom
Customers email purchase orders as PDFs, spreadsheets or email bodies, Conexiom reads them, and the resulting order data is delivered into the ERP. It supports many ERPs, Epicor among them.
If you are evaluating Conexiom for Epicor Kinetic, ask how the Kinetic integration is delivered, how new customer formats are onboarded, who makes changes when an order needs handling differently, and what review and approval happen before an order reaches Epicor.
Press hardest on onboarding. Conexiom maps each new customer's format before that customer's orders are automated, so every new trading partner waits on that work. Ask how long a new format takes today, who does the work, and whether it is included in your contract.
Fluent
Fluent is built by Technology Coast Partners (TCP), an Epicor Platinum Partner with more than 20 years implementing Epicor and more than 600 implementations, all in manufacturing and distribution. It runs agents for ten Epicor Kinetic screens, and Order Entry is one of them.
For a sales order, the agent reads the document forwarded or emailed to it (PDF, scan, photo, spreadsheet, email body, XML or EDI) and resolves it against live Epicor data:
- Customer, and the customer's own currency and terms.
- Parts, including the customer's own part numbers.
- Units of measure for each line.
- Duplicate check: any existing order already carrying the same customer PO number is flagged before the draft is created.
Any part or unit it cannot resolve is named on that line of the draft. Nothing is written to Epicor while an approval is pending. The approval workflow routes the draft through stages, each with an approver picked by name, by whoever is least busy, or by the AI from a pool, and a condition written in plain language decides whether a stage is needed. Before each approver opens the draft, an approval agent reviews it against that approver's written responsibility and marks it "nothing flagged" or "needs review" with a note on what to look at. The approved transaction is validated by Epicor's own business logic, and every field read and decision made, including who signed on whose behalf, is recorded in the audit log.
There are no templates per customer, no field mapping and no model training. Behavior is set with written instructions, for example "this customer's part numbers carry a trailing revision letter, ignore it", and when a reviewer corrects a draft, the correction becomes an instruction.
Side-by-side comparison
| Fluent | Conexiom | |
|---|---|---|
| Positioning | Agents for Epicor Kinetic documents | Sales order automation across many ERPs |
| ERP coverage | Epicor Kinetic | Many ERPs, Epicor among them |
| Order formats read | PDF, scans, photos, spreadsheets, email bodies, XML, EDI | PDF, spreadsheets, email bodies; EDI and XML: confirm with Conexiom |
| Per-customer setup | No templates, no field mapping, no model training | Each new customer format is mapped by Conexiom; confirm current turnaround |
| Who changes behavior | Your team, with written instructions; corrections become instructions | Confirm with Conexiom |
| Customer part numbers and units | Resolved against live Epicor data, unresolved items named per line | Confirm how resolved for Epicor Kinetic |
| Duplicate PO check | Flags any existing order with the same customer PO number | Confirm with Conexiom |
| What sits in Epicor | Nothing installed: no customization, BPM, staging table or import file | Confirm with Conexiom |
| Access to Epicor | REST API from outside, with a generated access scope Epicor enforces | Confirm with Conexiom |
| Review before posting | Nothing written to Epicor while an approval is pending; an approval agent notes what each approver should check | Confirm with Conexiom |
| Approval workflows | Stages, plain-language conditions, approvers picked by name, workload or the AI, out-of-office delegates, approve by replying to the email, return to the owner with a reason | Not described; confirm with Conexiom |
| Other document types | Ten Kinetic screens, including AP Invoice Entry, Receipt Entry and Cash Receipts Entry | Primarily order-to-cash; confirm current scope |
| Maturity | Newer product from a long-standing Epicor partner | Long-established in sales order automation |
Where a Conexiom cell says "confirm", the answer depends on the product version and your deployment, so ask for it in writing during evaluation.
When Conexiom is enough
- You run more than one ERP. If some business units run Epicor and others run a different ERP, one order automation vendor across all of them is worth having, and Fluent is built for Epicor Kinetic only.
- You are mid-contract and not adding customers. If every customer you need is already mapped and nobody else needs to sign off, switching before renewal may not pay. Revisit it at renewal, or when sign-off or scope changes.
Where Fluent fits
For Epicor Kinetic teams, Fluent is the better choice when:
- Orders need sign-off before Epicor. Approval workflows route each draft through stages, pick approvers by name, by workload or by the AI, skip a stage a plain-language condition says is not needed, and route around anyone out of office to a delegate who signs on their behalf. An approval agent tells each approver what to check, and they can decide by replying to the email. Nothing is written to Epicor while an approval is pending.
- Nothing may be installed inside Epicor. Fluent calls the Kinetic REST API from outside. It works on-premise or Epicor-hosted, restricted networks allowlist Fluent's fixed egress IPs, and each agent's access scope lists exactly the services it calls, so your Epicor administrator can see and enforce what it touches.
- You want to control behavior yourself. Instructions are plain written sentences, so the order desk or the Epicor administrator can change how a customer's orders are handled without a change request to a vendor.
- Other documents are next on the list. The same platform drafts AP invoices with two-way and three-way matching, receipts from packing slips, cash receipts from remittances, quotes, shipments, time entries and more. One vendor, one review screen, one credit balance.
- Duplicate orders are a real problem. Customers resend POs, forward them twice or send a revision with the same number. Fluent flags any existing order carrying the same customer PO number before it drafts.
- You keep adding customers. A new customer's first order is read like any other. There is no format to map and no queue to wait in, so growth adds no onboarding work.
- You want to start quickly. Setup is about thirty minutes of accounts and onboarding, and most teams review documents the same day.
We started our implementation call at 4:30 yesterday. First sales orders processing by 4:50. Minimal mistakes out the box.
Richard Gardner · Group IT Director, Luceco
Luceco posted about its first day on EpiUsers.help. More Epicor teams are in our customer stories.
How to decide
Run both on the same batch of your own orders. Pick purchase orders that are hard for your team today: a customer who uses their own part numbers, one who orders in a different unit than you stock, one who sends revisions under the same PO number, and one who sends a photo or a spreadsheet. Then compare:
- How many lines arrive fully resolved against your Epicor data.
- How clearly each tool says what it could not resolve, and where.
- How long a person spends reviewing each draft.
- What your Epicor administrator has to install, grant or maintain.
- What it takes to change handling for one customer.
- Which other documents you want to automate over the next year, and whether the same tool covers them.
- Route one order to two approvers by a written rule, such as "orders from a new customer also go to credit", and see who receives it.
- Mark an approver out of office and see whether the order waits for them or reaches their delegate.
- Approve an order by replying to the approval email.
- Check what each approver is told was flagged before they open the order.
Stay on Conexiom if you run several ERPs. On Epicor Kinetic, Fluent gives you approval workflows before anything reaches Epicor, no format mapping for new customers, and AP, receipts and cash receipts on the same platform.
You do not have to switch in one go. If you are under contract, start Fluent on the customers Conexiom does not cover, or on AP invoices and packing slips, and move the remaining customers when the term ends.
See Fluent on your own orders
The order entry automation page covers sales orders in detail, and the Epicor integration page explains the connection and access scope. To compare it with Conexiom on your own purchase orders, book a demo.
Frequently Asked Questions
Yes. For Epicor Kinetic sales order entry, Fluent does the same job, reading customer purchase orders and drafting sales orders, and adds approval workflows before anything reaches Epicor, no per-customer format mapping, and nine more Kinetic screens. Fluent is built only for Epicor Kinetic, so a company that needs order automation across several ERPs needs a multi-ERP product such as Conexiom.
No. Fluent uses no templates per customer, no field mapping and no model training. Behavior is set with written instructions, and a reviewer's corrections become instructions, so a new customer's first order is handled without setup.
Nothing. Fluent calls Epicor Kinetic's REST API from outside, with no customization, BPM, staging table or import file. Each agent generates an Epicor access scope listing exactly the services it calls; you import it and Epicor enforces it.
Not by default. Nothing is written to Epicor while an approval is pending. Approval workflows route each draft to the people who sign off on it, and an approval agent reviews it for each of them first. Where you allow it for an approver, the agent approves on their behalf when nothing is flagged, and if its review fails the draft falls back to a person, so nothing is approved silently. Every decision is in the audit log, and transactions are validated by Epicor's own business logic either way.
Fluent has agents for ten Epicor Kinetic screens: Quote Entry, Order Entry, Customer Shipment, AR Invoice Entry, Cash Receipts Entry, PO Entry, Receipt Entry, AP Invoice Entry, Time Entry and Issue Material. Every document and chat draws from the same credit balance.
Paid plans start at $600/month, with usage metered in credits. Invited teams start on a 30-day trial on one agent, with a credit balance included. Details are on the pricing page.


